Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Peyser
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 6, 1941No. 7528PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUTLEDGE, Justice.
The appeal is from an order of the District Court dismissing appellants’ petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees out of funds in the hands of receivers, appellees Peyser and Tumulty.
The pertinent facts are substantially as follows: July 2, 1931, appellants as attorneys for Leslie M. Shaw filed a bill for receivership and foreclosure of the property of Wardman Real Estate Properties, Inc. After the defendants named in the bill, including the present appellee Central Hanover Bank & Trust Company, had been served and had appeared, on July 10, 1931, appellants as attorneys…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Harkin v. BrundageSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Linstead v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- National Ben. Life Ins. Co. v. Shaw-Walker Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Lewis v. GaillardSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Leon F. Urbain and Loxit Systems, Inc. v. Knapp Brothers Manufacturing Company, Al Levinson, Charles Levinson, and Robert LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- Horizons Titanium Corporation v. Norton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Bach v. Friden Calculating MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Schwartz v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Schad v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.