Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Galvanizing Co. v. Marquette Tool & Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 5, 1928No. 3937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAGE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff’s (appellant’s) suit, charging infringement of Heisel patent No. 1,486,746, for power press, was dismissed for want of equity. The allegation of the bill is that defendant “used and caused to be used,” and “threatens to continue the use of,” the infringing device. Upon the trial, plaintiff limited its claim as follows:

“We are here before your honor purely on a complaint that they [defendant] are aiding and abetting others, urging others, to infringe our patent; they are contributory infringers. * * * What we object to is their advertising in their- catalogue that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  2. Computing Scale Co. v. Toledo Computing Scale Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
  3. Popular Mechanics Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicopee Manufacturing Corp. v. Columbus Fiber Mills Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1958
  2. Conmar Products Corporation v. TibonyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1945
  3. Graham Paper Co. v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API