Legal Opinion

Weir v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided April 18, 2008No. 03-07-00083-CRPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

G. ALAN WALDROP, Justice.

The trial court adjudicated David Eugene Weir guilty of burglary after finding that he violated the terms of his deferred adjudication community supervision. The court orally sentenced him to ten years in prison, then also assessed amounts due in court costs, attorney’s fees, and restitution in the written judgment. Weir appeals, complaining that the addition of amounts due rendered the judgment improper. Weir requests reformation of the judgment to delete those additional amounts. We modify the judgment by deleting the awards of court costs and restitution,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Manuel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Ex Parte MaddingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Ex Parte CavazosCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Ex Parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. Ex Parte HuskinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Weir v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Sauceda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
  3. Burke v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  4. Alfred Weeks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  5. Christopher Daniel Burke v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API