State v. Jordan
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s decision to exclude evidence seized by law enforcement pursuant to an invalid nighttime search warrant and subsequent dismissal of the complaint. Because we conclude that the search was a technical violation of the statute and not a constitutional violation due to the fact that respondent was not home when the warrant was executed, we conclude that the district court erred in applying the exclusionary rule to suppress the evidence seized during the search and that the error had a critical impact on the outcome of the case. We…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Ronald Raymond Ravich and Edward McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007