Moore v. Fenton
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WERNICK, Justice.
Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment for defendant entered upon a verdict in favor of the defendant which was directed by the presiding Justice at the close of plaintiff’s evidence presented during a jury trial.
We sustain the appeal. 1
Plaintiff seeks recovery for damages to his oil delivery truck allegedly sustained in a collision with an automobile operated by the defendant.
I
When the presiding Justice directed the verdict for defendant he gave as the basic reason:
“There is no evidence in this case of any negligence of the defendant, I haven’t seen any—not one word.”
In the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goldstein v. SklarSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Crockett v. StaplesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
- Davis v. SimpsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1941
- Scammon v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
- Tinker v. TrevettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Portland Valve, Inc. v. Rockwood Systems Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Isaacson v. Husson CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Costa v. LairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Estate of Berthiaume v. PRATT, MDSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Brewer v. Roosevelt Motor LodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.