Legal Opinion

Moore v. Fenton

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 5, 1972PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WERNICK, Justice.

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment for defendant entered upon a verdict in favor of the defendant which was directed by the presiding Justice at the close of plaintiff’s evidence presented during a jury trial.

We sustain the appeal. 1

Plaintiff seeks recovery for damages to his oil delivery truck allegedly sustained in a collision with an automobile operated by the defendant.

I

When the presiding Justice directed the verdict for defendant he gave as the basic reason:

“There is no evidence in this case of any negligence of the defendant, I haven’t seen any—not one word.”

In the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. SklarSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  2. Crockett v. StaplesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  3. Davis v. SimpsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1941
  4. Scammon v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  5. Tinker v. TrevettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Portland Valve, Inc. v. Rockwood Systems Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Isaacson v. Husson CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. Costa v. LairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Estate of Berthiaume v. PRATT, MDSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  5. Brewer v. Roosevelt Motor LodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API