C. F. & G. W. Eddy v. Lamb
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Lapeer; Dodds, J., presiding. Assumpsit by C. E. & G. W. Eddy against Horace Lamb and George R. Lamb, copartners as Horace Lamb & Co., for money had and received. There was judgment for defendants, and both parties bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff, a foreign corporation, sued defendants, copartners, for a small balance claimed to be due upon transactions involving the shipment, from the latter to the former, of several hundred car loads of hay. The cause was sent to a referee, who filed his conclusions of fact and law, exceptions to which were heard, and a judgment for the defendants was rendered, in the circuit court. The cause is before us on separate appeals, taken by the respective párties. We dispose of both together.
The plaintiff claimed a balance due to it of $762.98 and interest, while the defendants claimed that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Abbott v. MathewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Runnels v. MoffatMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- People ex. rel. First National Bank v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Ortmann v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- St. Denis v. SaundersMichigan Supreme Court · 1877