Runnels v. Moffat
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Stevens, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This is an action of assumpsit commenced in the circuit court for St. Clair county on September 14, 1885. The following is a copy of a promissory note set out in the declaration:
“ $550. Port Huron, Mich., March 16, 1879.
“Six months after date I promise to pay to the order of D. N. Runnels five hundred and fifty dollars, at my 'office, Port Huron, Mich. Value received, with interest at ten per cent. James Mope at.”
*190On January 26, 1886, defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice of set-off. March 31, 1886, the attorneys of the respective parties appeared in open court, and by their…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Altman v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Gibson v. BurrowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- People ex. rel. First National Bank v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Bryant v. HendeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grigsby v. DaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Kennebec Housing Co. v. BartonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923
- C. F. & G. W. Eddy v. LambMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Detroit Club Holdings LLC v. Jay EdwardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Detroit Club Holdings LLC v. Jay EdwardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.