Legal Opinion

Bobby Dodd v. City of Chattanooga, Tenn.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 18, 2017No. 16-5470PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

This case arises out of a 2012 amendment to the law governing Chattanooga’s Fire and Police Pension Fund. Before 2013, a Fund member’s surviving spouse could receive benefits after the member died without incurring a proportional reduction in the member’s lifetime benefits. In 2012, the City of Chattanooga removed this “default death benefit” for members who were not eligible to retire as of January 1, 2013. Bobby Dodd was not eligible to retire on that date and therefore opted for a five-percent reduction in current, lifetime benefits so that his wife could…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. City of Pontiac Retired Employees v. Louis SchimmelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. Charles v. BaeslerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Puckett v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aaron J. Cryer v. City of DyersburgCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2021
  2. Clark v. CascioDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API