Legal Opinion

Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Cunningham

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided June 2, 1955PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marvel, Vice Chancellor:

Plaintiff seeks an order directing specific performance of a unilateral agreement made on August 8, 1940, by1 defendant, John C. Cunningham, Jr., then a single man. Plaintiff contends that having exercised its rights under the agreement, defendant and his wife must convey to plaintiff property consisting of a gasoline service station and designated equipment used in the operation of the station in return for payment of $20,000. The agreement or option which plaintiff seeks to enforce is set forth in paragraph 13 of a general2 agreement concerning the leasing of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Cities Service Oil Co. v. VieringIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Eastern States Petroleum Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1939
  4. Godwin v. CollinsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1868
  5. Matthes v. WierCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Reading Company, Debtor. Appeal of Trailer Train CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DoerrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. Esso Standard Oil Company v. CunninghamCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1955
  4. Ross v. CannonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
  5. L-5 Healthcare Partners, LLC v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API