Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stehley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1975No. Appeals, 124 to 127PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

In the instant case, appellant challenges three of his four convictions on four separate indictments for malicious use of telephones under our former Penal Code, 18 P.S. §4414.1 (App. 1973). The obscene phone calls for which appellant was convicted were made on numerous occasions to four different women between June, 1972, and April, 1973. In the case of three of the indictments, a substantial part of the evidence establishing Harry Stehley as the obscene phone caller was produced by the use of a “pen register” by the Commonwealth Telephone Company at the request of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. AgieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. United States v. FocarileDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. State v. HollidaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MelilliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. BeaufordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. MelilliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API