Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vandegrift v. Vandegrift

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 26, 1985No. 84-1253Published

1DissentSharp, Judge

I respectfully dissent because I think the trial judge’s $5,848.00 award to the wife in this case may be affirmed either on the basis of a special equity or lump sum alimony.

The evidence in this case was in some dispute regarding the parties’ agreement to specifically apply the net rent received from the wife’s separately-owned home to pay part of the mortgage payments on the husband’s home. But, reading the record *640most favorably to sustain the trial judge1, when the parties originally decided to marry and combine their respective families (her three daughters and his two sons) under one…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Painter v. PainterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Ball v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. Duncan v. DuncanSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  5. Wade v. WadeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API