Legal Opinion

Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 31, 1997No. CX-95-2097Published

1Opinion of the Court

567 N.W.2d 42 (1997)

Ronald W. KRONING, et al., Respondents,

v.

STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., petitioners, Appellants.

No. CX-95-2097.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 31, 1997.

William M. Hart, Katherine A. McBride, Meagher & Geer, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, for appellants.

Daniel J. Heuel, Muir, Heuel, Carlson & Spelhaug, P.A., Rochester, for respondents.

Michael J. Ford, Dyan J. Ebert, Melinda M. Sanders, St. Cloud, amicus curiae.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

BLATZ, Justice.

This appeal arises out of an action for uninsured motorist benefits brought…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Ora Greene Hudson, Administratrix of the Estate of Garland Hudson, Deceased v. David Lazarus, Samuel Juster and Calvin JusterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  4. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API