Bank v. Tarboro Cotton Factory

This case is reported 179 N. C., 203. The petitioner-does not deny the correctness of the propositions of law stated in the opinion, but claims that we overlooked the supplemental affidavit presented to the judge at the time when the attachment was dissolved.. We considered the entire record, and have again examined the same, and are of opinion that neither the original affidavit upon which the attachment was issued nor the supplemental petition or affidavit used on the hearing before Judge Connor are sufficient to sustain the warrant of attachment. The ground upon which_the attachment was…