Legal Opinion

Stephens Howard Co. v. Baer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

The only question of law presented by the appeal is whether the affidavit and complaint are sufficient to justify the issuance of the warrant of attachment against the defendant, who is a resident of this State.

There are two decisions of this Court directly in point: The first is Judd v. Mining Co., 120 N. C., 398, 27 S. E., 81, and the other is Bank v. Cotton Factory, 179 N. C., 203, 102 S. E., 195. A petition to rehear the case was denied in Bank v. Cotton Factory, 180 N. C., 128, 104 S. E., 129. The opinion in the original case asserts: “The precedents seem to hold that the affidavit upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Judd v. Crawford Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. First National Bank v. Tarboro Cotton FactorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Bank v. Tarboro Cotton FactorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Connolly v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API