Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Zasloff

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1939No. Appeal, 209PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

In this case the defendant, a retailer, was charged with violations of the so-called Fair Sales Act of July 1, 1937, P. L. 2672, specifically, that on three occasions he sold merchandise at less than the cost thereof to him. This appeal followed the order of court quashing the indictment and involves the question of the constitutionality of the act as an exercise of the police power of the State. Section 3 of the act provides: “Any retailer who shall advertise, offer to sell, or sell at retail, any merchandise at less than cost to the retailer, as defined in this act ......…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Jay Burns Baking Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Fairmont Creamery Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZasloffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. SigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Daniel Loughran Co. v. Lord Baltimore Candy & Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  5. Commonwealth v. GorodetskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API