Legal Opinion

in Re Commitment of Curtis Lee Adams

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided August 15, 2013No. 09-12-00393-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.

In an appeal from an order entered in a sexually-violent-predator proceeding, we are asked to address whether we possess appellate jurisdiction over a 2012 order, which changed the entity that was in charge of approving where Curtis Lee Adams resides from the Council on Sex Offender Treatment 1 to the Office of Violent Sex Offender Management, 2 by altering a 2002 final commitment order, as modified by a 2010 order. We conclude the trial court’s 2012 order is not appeal-able; we also conclude that mandamus relief on the issues Adams raises is not warranted.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. CMH HOMES v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. in Re Commitment of James Richards, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2013
  4. In Re Commitment of Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re: The Commitment of Jeffery Regan Eddings v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2025
  2. in Re Bobby Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
  3. in Re Curtis Adams, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2023
  4. in Re Lonnie Kade Welsh, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2018
  5. in Re the Commitment of Timothy Daniel Renshaw, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API