Legal Opinion

In re Kline

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1934No. 18422PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKEK, District Judge.

This ease comes now before the court on certificate to review an order of the referee allowing claims of Blauners Affiliated Stores, Inc.; L. E. Lindley; and the Haverfield Company, to certain moneys in the hands of the trustee as trust funds held for the benefit of parties claimant.

The question involved is whether or not these parties claimant occupy the position of creditors cestui que trustents as to certain moneys collected by the trustee. The referee allowed the funds in question to the claimants as trust funds.

From the facts of the ease, as disclosed in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Steele-Smith Dry Goods Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1924

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Universal Bonding Insurance Co. v. Gittens And Sprinkle Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. American Service Co. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  3. Henkin v. Rockower Bros., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  4. United States Nat. Bank v. Blauner's Affiliated Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
  5. Haverfield Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API