Legal Opinion

Kuzemchak v. Pitchford

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1967No. 8235PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPIESS, Judge, Court of Appeals-.

The question presented is whether a provision of a contract to convey lands by which the vendee agreed to assume a mortgage thereon, merged in a deed subsequently executed, in pursuance of the contract, which expressed no agreement by the vendee to assume the mortgage indebtedness but which operated merely to convey title to the vendee subject to the lien of the ¡mortgage.

- Appellants entered into a written contract - with appellees whereby appellants agreed to convey certain improved real estate of theirs to appellees. The land was encumbered by a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Continental Life Ins. Co. v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Norment v. TurleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Rosenthal v. HeftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  4. Smith v. KibbeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Chavez v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maxey v. QuintanaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Knight v. McCainMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kuzemchak v. PitchfordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API