Legal Opinion

Brooks v. W. T. Joyce Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 8, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from, Oairroll District Court.— IíoN. F. M. Powees, Judge. ActxoN to recover damages for personal injuries received while in defendant’s employ. At the conclusion of the evidence for tire plaintiff, the court, on motion, directed a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcClaiN, J.

The defendant company is carrying on the business of selling lumber at Carroll, Iowa; and plain*267tiff, at tbe time of receiving tbe injuries complained of, was a workman employed about its yards. Under tbe instruction of one Brown, wbo bad charge of tbe work in tbe yard under tbe direction of tbe defendant’s superintendent, plaintiff was engaged in loading a wagon witb bundles of maple flooring being taken from a pile of sucb lumber, and while thus engaged be,was injured by bundles from tbe pile falling against him and breaking bis leg. Tbe negligence charged is that tbe bundles of flooring…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Newbury ex rel. Newbury v. Getchel & Martin Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Way v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. McLaury v. City of McGregorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  4. Money v. Lower Vein Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  5. Beckman v. Consolidation Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Laf Ferry v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  2. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API