Legal Opinion
Thomas Irving Jones v. Sally Arross
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 29, 1993No. 93-8018PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.RApp.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This case requires us to decide whether a creditor who was not notified of a Chapter 12 bankruptcy may nonetheless be permitted to file a late proof of claim. Because we conclude that such late filing is not allowed under the Bankruptcy Rules, we reverse.
Appellee Sally Arross was divorced from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- In Re the YODER COMPANY, Debtor. Mark S. BRATTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the YODER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Coastal Alaska Lines, Inc., Debtor. Zidell, Inc. v. Daniel E. Forsch, Esq., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In Re ZimmermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Aboody v. United States (In Re Aboody)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 1998
- In Re FriesenhahnUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1994
- In Re HoganUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- In Re KristiniakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- In Re StewartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.