Legal Opinion

McAuley v. Chaplin-Fulton Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 1, 1907No. Appeal, No. 178PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 178, Oct. T., 1906, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., April Term, 1903, No. 875, on bill in equity in case of Robert G. McAuley v. The Chaplin-Fulton Manufacturing Company, a corporation, and Louis B. Fulton. Bill in equity for a,n injunction.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 178, Oct. T., 1906, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., April Term, 1903, No. 875, on bill in equity in case of Robert G. McAuley v. The Chaplin-Fulton Manufacturing Company, a corporation, and Louis B. Fulton. Bill in equity for a,n injunction. Frazer, P. J., filed the following opinion: The purpose of this bill is to secure an accounting for royalties upon the sale of boiler feeders manufactured and sold by defendant company under patents in which plaintiff claimed to have an interest. From the bill, answer and proofs we find the following facts: FINDING^ OF…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The decree dismissing the bill is affirmed at the cost of the appellant on the findings of fact and the conclusions of law of the learned judge of the common pleas.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Gonser v. Leland Detroit Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. West Disinfecting Co. v. United States Paper Mills, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API