Legal Opinion

People v. Ouellette

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1969No. Crim. 3509PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

Defendant was charged with possession of marijuana; moved to suppress evidence, i.e., marijuana he alleges was the product of an unlawful search and seizure, which was denied; was found guilty by the court without a jury; moves for a new trial, which was denied; and appealed pursuant to the provisions of former Penal Code section 1237, subdivision 2, contending the denial of his motion to suppress evidence was error.

On the afternoon of June 4, 1967, a member of the Navy Shore Patrol named Shank saw defendant Ouelette and his codefendant, Hewitt, at the corner of Third and Broadway, in San…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. MickelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. CockrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. McGrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. NicklesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Thomas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. People v. ChildsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. HanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API