Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hustler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1976No. 1292PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Judge:

This appeal is brought from the conviction of appellant and a co-defendant, by a jury, of the rape of a 17 year old girl. In his brief to this Court, appellant raises four arguments asserting error by the lower court. We find appellant’s contentions without merit and will affirm.

Appellant’s first two arguments, alleging improper prejudicial statements by both a witness and the lower court judge in his charge, are not supported by the record and need not be discussed. Appellant’s third assignment of error concerns the trial judge’s refusal to permit the use of a written report…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. StoltzfusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. SimonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matter of Pittsburgh Action Against RapeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. WeitkampSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. BryantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. DalahanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API