Commonwealth v. Dalahan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HESTER, Judge:
Appellant was convicted of attempted burglary and possession of an instrument of a crime and was sentenced to 2-23 months in jail and one year probation. Post-trial motions were denied and this appeal followed.
Appellant first asserts that this action should have been dismissed because the Commonwealth failed to try him *620within 180 days of the filing of the complaint. The Commonwealth, conceding that it did not bring appellant to trial within 180 days, asserts that appellant waived his Rule 1100 rights by signing a written waiver. Appellant contends, however, that this waiver was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EhrsamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. ManleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. PottsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. EdneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.