Legal Opinion

High Tech Diesel, Inc. v. Littleton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 1994No. 9200512CV; CA A79437PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Defendants appeal a supplemental judgment awarding attorney fees to plaintiff. They argue that the court erred in awarding plaintiff fees incurred in its defense of their counterclaim. We reverse.

Plaintiff performed repair work on a truck owned by defendants. When defendants did not pay for the service, plaintiff filed a notice of claim of a non-possessory lien on the truck. Plaintiff then filed a complaint to foreclose the lien and obtained an order to recover possession of the truck from defendants. The sheriff seized the truck pursuant to that order.

The parties entered into a stipulation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estate of Wesley E. Smith v. WareOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Malot v. HadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Greb v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Sunset Fuel & Engineering Co. v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Forsythe v. Homestead Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Platt Electric Supply, Inc. v. JC Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API