Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1870PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction.

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge

The defendant was convicted of gambling, in the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction, and fined ten dollars, and the court thereupon allowed an appeal, ordered a stay of proceedings, and took the proper recognizance. The clerk, under the provisions of section 16, pp. 1114-15, Wagner’s Statutes, sent up the transcript, but the appellant fails to prosecute his appeal by presenting a brief of the facts and points upon which he relies, or to appear at all in this court.

At the last term, counsel for the State brought in the transcript and moved an affirmance of the judgment upon the ground that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Miller v. DailySupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Martin v. WoffordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. State v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. State ex rel. LaRue v. HitchcockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. State Ex Rel. Lashley v. IttnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API