Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Bingle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 9, 1932No. 9645PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The litigants own directly opposite properties fronting on “Heights Boulevard,” at Sixteenth street in Houston; Mr. Goodman’s being the southwest corner of that intersection and Mr. Bingle’s the southeast one. Their respective titles came down through mesne conveyances under a common source, the Omaha & South Texas Land Company, a corporation, the deeds from which, in both instances, containing this restriction: “This deed is made and acceptei with the express understanding and agreement that no residence building shall be erected or any property fronting on the Boulevard in said Houston…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Curlee v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hooper v. LottmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Scull v. EilenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  5. Pierson v. CanfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Horace Case v. Arthur E. MorrisetteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Scaling v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Calvary Temple v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. O'Malley v. Central Methodist ChurchArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Overton v. RaglandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API