Legal Opinion
Pierson v. Canfield
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 4, 1925No. 9358PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLooney, J.
From a decree in favor of appellees enforcing a restrictive covenant in a deed, appellant prosecutes this appeal.
' Appellees alleged that they and appellant owned residence lots in Trinity Heights addition No. 1 to the city of Dallas, claiming title by mesne conveyances from the Trinity Heights syndicate as common grantor; that the syndicate platted the addition into residence lots, and, in order to render them attractive to purchasers, inserted in all deeds conveying lots, certain restrictive clauses, among pthers, one providing that no house should be built on Woodin boulevard to cost less…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Parsons v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MahaffeyTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Judd v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Sailer v. PodolskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Voice of Cornerstone Church Corp. v. Pizza Property Partners, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc. v. Capital Outdoors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Smith v. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Monk v. DannaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Scott v. Champion Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.