Legal Opinion
Samuel Feinman v. A. H. Bull Steamship Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 28, 1954No. 10950PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
The suit at bar is a diversity action for personal injuries brought by the plaintiff, Feinman, a marine electrician employed by the Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company (Sun), to recover damages for injuries sustained when he was struck by a falling hatch beam while working on board the S. S. Angelina, owned and operated by A. H. Bull Steam ship Company (Bull) and being refitted while lying at dockside, by Sun at Chester, Pennsylvania. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Bull. A motion to set aside the verdict and to enter judgment for Feinman was denied. See D.C., 107…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alaska Steamship Co. v. PettersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Petterson v. Alaska S. S. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Crawford v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. Lucibello v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Rogers v. United States LinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Brabazon v. Belships Co., Limited, Skibs A/sCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jackson v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Vincent Klimaszewski v. Pacific-Atlantic Steamship Co., Inc., Jarka Corporation of Philadelphia, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Turner v. Transportacion Maritima Mexicana S. A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Shaver Transportation Co. v. ChamberlainCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Spann v. LauritzenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.