Legal Opinion
Sepehry-Fard v. Department Stores National Bank
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 14, 2014No. Case No. 13-cv-03131-WHOPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS
Re: Dkt. Nos. 80, 83, 84, 90, 92, 93
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge
Currently before the Court are defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (Docket Nos. 80, 83) and plaintiffs motions for leave to amend, to compel, to challenge the Court’s jurisdiction, and to reconsider plaintiff’s de*986mand that the Court facilitate a grand jury investigation. Docket Nos. 84, 90, 92, 93. These motions are current set for hearing on February 19, 2014. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-l(b), the Court finds these…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnson v. Phoenix, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024