Legal Opinion

Diebold Safe Lock Co. v. Fulton, Supt.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MONTGOMERY, J.

Upon a somewhat similar state of facts, to-wit; In Re Exchange Bank of Bloomdale, 38 OLR, 221, 44 Oh Ap, 385 (13 Abs 465), the court held:

“A motion has been filed by the claimant to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the case is not one in chancery, and that therefore this court does not have appellate jurisdiction thereof. The contention of Shoup is that he deposited with the bank for safe-keeping, and to hold for him in trust, $1,500 in Liberty bonds, which the bank received pursuant to §710-110, GC, and he seeks by this proceeding to fasten a trust on the assets…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Liquidation of Exchange BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kochs, Admx. v. KochsOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Miller v. Canton Motor Coach, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API