Legal Opinion

Kochs, Admx. v. Kochs

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MONTGOMERY, J.

The uniform declaratory judgment act, §§12102-1 to 12102-16, GC, does not establish or change any substantive rights. Subsection 12 states: “This act is declared to be remedial; its purpose is to settle and to afford relief from uncertainty and insecurity with respect to rights, status and other legal relations.”

Sub-section 7 of this act provides that “all orders, judgments and decrees under this act may be reviewed as other orders, judgments and decrees.” In other words, if the cause of action were equitable in its nature, so that an appeal might be perfected from the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Diebold Safe Lock Co. v. Fulton, Supt.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dillon v. GakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Otten v. Cincinnati city, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1937
  3. Henry H. Stambaugh Auditorium Ass'n v. City of YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Greene County Law Library Ass'n v. CurlettOhio Court of Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API