Legal Opinion

Hooten v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 1930No. 13838PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— Robbery is the offense; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for a period of twenty-two years.

In a joint indictment, J. P. Slay and Landis Hooten were charged with robbery. There was a severance.

The evidence of the State comes from L. W. Currie, Sr., and L. W. Currie, Jr., who were inmates of the A. & P. Store at the time the robbery took place. Each of them testified upon the trial that the appellant, using firearms and putting them in fear of death, committed the robbery, and took from the possession of L. W. Currie, Sr., such money as he had, amounting to two…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Arthur Blair v. Marilyn Badenhope - Concurring/DissentingTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Betty Baxter v. Heritage Bank & Trust, and Proctor Financial Insurance Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  4. Clear Water Partners, LLC v. Charles e. BensonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
  5. Joseph C. Barna v. W. Martin SeilerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API