Legal Opinion

Arthur Blair v. Marilyn Badenhope - Concurring/Dissenting

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2002No. E1999-02748-SC-R11-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 6, 2001 Session ARTHUR BLAIR v. MARILYN BADENHOPE Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals, Eastern Section Chancery Court for Greene County No. 93-101 Thomas R. Frierson II, Chancellor No. E1999-02748-SC-R11-CV - Filed May 3, 2002 FRANK F. DROWOTA , III, C.J., concurring and dissenting. I fully agree with the majority’s conclusion that a natural parent cannot generally invoke the doctrine of superior parental rights to modify a valid order of custody, even when that order resulted from the natural parent’s voluntary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WilkersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Memphis Housing Authority v. ThompsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Logan v. WinsteadTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Hooten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API