State v. Vermillion
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BARDGETT, Judge.
On a prior appeal this cause was “reversed and remanded for the conduct of a hearing on the question of the applicability of the Second Offender Act and for a re-*439sentencing of the defendant or the granting of a new trial on all issues, depending upon the court’s finding on such hearing.” See State v. Vermillion, Mo., 446 S.W.2d 788.
The occasion for the remand was the failure of the trial court to enter its finding that would make the Second Offender Act, § 556.280, V.A.M.S., applicable. The reason that the sentence was set aside was because, in this case, the circuit judge did…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- State v. GarrettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. DaytonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- State v. MotleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- State Ex Rel. O'Brien v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.