Legal Opinion

State v. Motley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1976No. 37211PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENDLEN, Judge.

John Patrick Motley appeals his convic-' tion on two counts for illegal sale of marijuana, a Schedule I Controlled Substance, under § 195.200 RSMo.1969, V.A.M.S.1 Having a prior controlled substance felony conviction, Motley received the minimum mandatory sentences provided in § 195.200, subsection 1(5), on each count, the sentences to run concurrently.

Defendant concedes the sufficiency of the evidence but challenges the constitutionality of pertinent portions of § 195.200.2 We have examined this contention and as hereinafter discussed, conclude jurisdiction lies in this court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Douglas v. BuderSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. McCoyIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. HurttSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. State v. AgeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. HigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. State v. OlinghouseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. State v. FreitasHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API