Legal Opinion
State v. Robison
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 13, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Before Benet, J., Spartanburg, October, 1900. Indictment against W. H. Robison for selling liquors, maintaining a nuisance and keeping and storing liquors for unlawful use. From sentence on verdict of guilty, defendant appeals. No argument. cites: As to the law providing tags on stored whiskey: 59 S. C., 271.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Pope.
The defendant was tried and convicted under an indictment, containing three counts, charging him with violations of what is known as the dispensary law of this State, and he has appealed after judgment upon the following grounds:
“The 'Circuit Judge erred:
“I. In allowing J. J. Bishop to- testify on the part of the State, over the defendant’s objection, that the said witness’ name did not appear on the indictment, for the reason that it was incompetent and irrelevant to allow said witness to testify without his name appearing on the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- City of Spartanburg v. ParrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Town of Mayesville v. ClampSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Varner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929