Lemming v. University of Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, P.J.
The single issue in this appeal is whether the accidental injury to plaintiff-appellant, Day Lemming, was compensable under R.C. Chapter 4123 (workers’ compensation) as being received in the course of, and arising out of, her employment. R. C. 4123.01(C). The Industrial Commission and the court of common pleas both held that the injury was not com-pensable. We disagree. The circumstances of the injury fall between several precedents, and the case should not be disposed of in a summary fashion. We have, therefore, sua sponte removed this appeal from the accelerated calendar.
In an appeal from…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Littlefield v. Pillsbury Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Industrial Commission v. AhernOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Kohlmayer v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Kasari v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Metropolitan Life Ins. v. ContieOhio Supreme Court · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Remer v. ConradOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Carrick v. Riser Foods, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Williams v. Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Collins v. W. S. Life Ins. Co., C-070189 (5-2-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Fitch v. Ameritech Corp., 05ap-1277 (6-5-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.