Legal Opinion

Canty v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge COLINS.

Curtis Canty petitions for review of that portion of a determination by the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board), dated February 15, 2005, denying his petition for administrative relief from the Board’s January 3, 2005 order, that denied him credit for “in-home monitoring/house arrest from 7/15/2003 to 8/24/2003 and that refused to provide him with an evidentiary hearing on this issue.”

Canty was originally sentenced to a term of 3 years, 41 days to 6 years, 82 days by the Philadelphia and Chester County Common Pleas Courts for multiple robbery…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KristonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. KyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Booth v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Booth v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miskovitch v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. MaxwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API