Booth v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge COLINS.
Arthur Booth petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole that denied Booth’s request for relief captioned as a petition for administrative relief.
The pertinent facts are summarized as follows. The Board released Booth on February 11, 2002 on parole from an eighteen-year sentence for murder. Under the terms of his parole, Booth was required to spend a minimum of six months at the “Renewal Center.” After he completed a program there, he was released to an approved residence on September 6, 2002. According to the Board,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rivenbark v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. KristonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. ChiappiniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. WegleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Jackson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MaxwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Johnson v. MurrayCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Canty v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005