Potlatch Corp. v. United States
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Justice.
This case arises from the Snake River Basin Adjudication in which the district court granted in part and denied in part the United States’ motion for partial summary judgment on claims the United States makes for reserved water rights pursuant to the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The United States claims federal reserved water rights for the following rivers pursuant to the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 1 : the Middle Fork of the Salmon, the Middle Fork of the Clearwater (including its two tributaries: the Lochsa River and the Selway…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sweitzer v. DeanIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Ada County Assessor v. Roman Catholic Diocese of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Pocatello v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Potlatch Corp. v. United StatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- South Valley Ground Water v. ID Dept of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
- United States v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.