Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schatzel v. Connelie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 1983Published

1DissentLevine, J.

Levine, J. (dissenting).

As I read the uncontested averments in respondent Connelie’s answer and its attachments, for at least the past 21 years the State Police have interpreted subdivision 3 of section 215 of the Executive Law and the applicable State regulation (9 NYCRR 475.1 [b]) to require an applicant to attain his or her 29th birthday before the effective date of appointment as a State trooper and, except in one isolated instance, have uniformly enforced that age limitation. Since comparable absolute age limits for appointment to security/police positions have been upheld, whether…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. KahnNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Lefrak Forest Hills Corp. v. GalvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  3. Figueroa v. BronsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Lefrak Forest Hills Corp. v. GalvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Leap v. LevittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API