Schatzel v. Connelie
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentLevine, J.
Levine, J. (dissenting).
As I read the uncontested averments in respondent Connelie’s answer and its attachments, for at least the past 21 years the State Police have interpreted subdivision 3 of section 215 of the Executive Law and the applicable State regulation (9 NYCRR 475.1 [b]) to require an applicant to attain his or her 29th birthday before the effective date of appointment as a State trooper and, except in one isolated instance, have uniformly enforced that age limitation. Since comparable absolute age limits for appointment to security/police positions have been upheld, whether…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nicholas v. KahnNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Lefrak Forest Hills Corp. v. GalvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Figueroa v. BronsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Lefrak Forest Hills Corp. v. GalvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Leap v. LevittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.