Legal Opinion

Figueroa v. Bronstein

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1976PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

We hold that the action of the State Civil Service Commission establishing 32 years as the maximum age for application for appointment as correction officer is not violative of constitutional provision.

Section 6 of article V, of our State Constitution provides in part: "Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and *535villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive [with exceptions not here applicable]”.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Matter of Thomas v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. MATTER OF MAYE v. LindsayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  4. Maye v. LindsayNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Matter of Deodati v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. DraytonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Alevy v. Downstate Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. IllardoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Donahue v. Boston, City OfCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API