Legal Opinion

Lance Reberger v. Renee Baker

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 9, 2016No. 13-17135, 14-15142UnpublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Lance Reberger is a prisoner incarcerated in Nevada who has been placed in administrative segregation. In 2013, Re-berger submitted two complaints pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in conjunction with applications to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). The district court denied both applications on the basis that Reberger had violated the “three-strikes” rule of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Under the PLRA, prisoners are ineligible for IFP status if they have brought three or more civil actions or appeals while incarcerated or detained that were dismissed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Andrews v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Coleman v. TollefsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. (PC) Brookins v. RenteriaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  2. (PC) Evans v. SiebelDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. (PC) Gradford v. VelascoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. (PC) Hammler v. Dignity HealthDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (PC) Luedtke v. GriesbachDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API