Legal Opinion

United States v. Kurt Robert Risnes

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 29, 1990No. 89-5598MNPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

Kurt Robert Risnes appeals his conviction for conspiracy to counterfeit obligations of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and aiding and abetting the possession of counterfeit devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 474. Risnes alleges that the district court 1 (1) abused its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial based on the prosecutor’s remarks bolstering the credibility of a key prosecution witness during closing argument; (2) erred in denying his motion to suppress inculpatory statements; and (3) abused its discretion in limiting…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. David GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Billy Lee JorgensenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Bruce A. Beckman, United States of America v. Thomas KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Dewey G. CrumpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. State v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. United States v. James Ernest CrockettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. Hooks v. WorkmanDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API