Legal Opinion
Hooks v. Workman
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 26, 2010No. Case CIV-96-732-MPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VICKI MILES-LaGRANGE, Chief Judge.
Petitioner, a state prisoner currently facing execution of a sentence of death, appears with counsel and petitions for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254, challenging his sentence of death and his post-conviction mental retardation trial. Respondent has responded to Petitioner’s Amended Second Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (hereinafter “Petition.”) 1 Petitioner has replied to this response. The state court record of the post-conviction mental retardation trial has been supplied. 2
1. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This is…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hooks v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Hooks v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012