Legal Opinion

McCune v. Harris

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 1935No. Civ. No. 10473PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, J., pro tem.

This action arises out of a promissory note in the principal sum of $2,300, executed by the eight defendants herein in favor of plaintiff. Collateral was pledged as security for the payment of the obligation, and the note contained appropriate recitals regarding the sale of such collateral in case of default, together with the application of the proceeds, except for the following significant alteration in the printed form of the note: The clauses “returning the overplus to the undersigned. And the undérsigned agrees to pay the holder hereof any deficiency upon demand” were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Schaake v. Eagle Automatic Can Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Zimmer Construction Co. v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Sturgeon v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Loper v. FlynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API