Legal Opinion
Microsoft Corp. v. McGee
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 18, 2007No. 1:06CV611PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BARRETT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 10). Defendant Mark McGee has not filed a Response.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Microsoft develops, markets, distributes and licenses computer software. (Doc. 1, ¶ 7) One such program is Office 2000 Professional (“Office 2000 Pro”), which is a suite of popular Microsoft software programs including Access 2000, Excel 2000, Outlook 2000, PowerPoint 2000, Word 2000, and Publisher 2000. Microsoft holds valid copyrights for all of these programs (including…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Castworld Products, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Edward Antoine v. Atlas Turner, Inc., Royal Insurance Company of Canada Canadian General Insurance Company and Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Zinganything, LLC v. Import StoreDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
- Microsoft Corp. v. NopDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Kendall Holdings, Ltd. v. Eden Cryogenics LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Hanley-Wood LLC v. Hanley Wood LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Clever Covers, Inc. v. Southwest Florida Storm Defense, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2008
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.