Legal Opinion

Roth v. Roth

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 29, 1980No. 79-514PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stengel

This interlocutory appeal has been allowed to review an order of the Circuit Court of Peoria County denying a motion to disqualify defendant Melvin Roth’s attorney on the ground of conflict of interest. The facts of this cause are not disputed.

The estate of decedent Edwin Roth has spawned extensive litigation involving his son Melvin Roth, a co-executor, and the three Roth sisters, Irene Roth, Alice Roth, and Frances Miller. The present suit involves a claim by the Roth sisters, plaintiffs, that defendant Melvin Roth has failed to make proper accountings of income and expenses from the farm…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The People v. StovalIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. KesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Dr. Ing. Max Schloetter v. Railoc of Indiana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. Keith B. Redd, D/B/A Abajo Petroleum v. Shell Oil Company, in the Matter of Michael W. Graney, Attorney for Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lazy Seven Coal Sales, Inc. v. Stone & Hinds, P.C.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Skokie Gold Standard Liquors, Inc. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. First National Bank v. St. Charles National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. International Insurance v. City of Chicago HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Bowen v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API