Legal Opinion
Mandel Brothers, Inc. v. Wallace
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 8, 1948No. 16PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
The respondent, owner of Wallace and Hand patent No. 2,236,387, filed a complaint against this petitioner for infringement of claims 1 to 6, 8 to 13, 15 and 16. The District Court held the claims invalid for want of patentable invention and dismissed the complaint. 67 F. Supp. 814. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held the claims valid and reversed. 164 F. 2d 861. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit had previously affirmed a district court’s invalidation of the same patent. Wallace v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 45 F. Supp. 465; 133 F. 2d 763. To…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wallace v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Wallace v. Mandel Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Wallace v. F. W. Woolworth Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Armour & Co. v. Wilson & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Tatnall Measuring Systems Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Carter Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Griffith Rubber Mills, a Corporation v. Henry S. HoffarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.